Talk:Messier 103
 | A fact from Messier 103 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Move all. —Wknight94 (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- Globular Cluster M2 to Messier 2
- Globular Cluster M4 to Messier 4
- Globular Cluster M9 to Messier 9
- Open Cluster M21 to Messier 21
- Open Cluster M26 to Messier 26
- Dwarf Elliptical Galaxy M32 to Messier 32
- Open Cluster M34 to Messier 34
- Open Cluster M35 to Messier 35
- Open Cluster M36 to Messier 36
- Open Cluster M37 to Messier 37
- Open Cluster M39 to Messier 39
- Open Cluster M41 to Messier 41
- M43 (nebula) to Messier 43
- Open Cluster M46 to Messier 46
- Open Cluster M47 to Messier 47
- Open Cluster M48 to Messier 48
- Open Cluster M50 to Messier 50
- Open Cluster M52 to Messier 52
- Globular Cluster M53 to Messier 53
- Globular Cluster M54 to Messier 54
- Globular Cluster M55 to Messier 55
- Globular Cluster M56 to Messier 56
- Spiral Galaxy M66 to Messier 66
- Open Cluster M67 to Messier 67
- Globular Cluster M68 to Messier 68
- Globular Cluster M69 to Messier 69
- Globular Cluster M70 to Messier 70
- Globular Cluster M72 to Messier 72
- M73 (star group) to Messier 73
- Globular Cluster M75 to Messier 75
- Lenticular Galaxy M84 to Messier 84
- Elliptical Galaxy M87 to Messier 87
- Spiral Galaxy M91 to Messier 91
- Globular Cluster M92 to Messier 92
- Open Cluster M93 to Messier 93
- Spiral Galaxy M100 to Messier 100
- Open Cluster M103 to Messier 103
- Dwarf Elliptical Galaxy M110 to Messier 110
- Most of these go against the typical Wikipedia convention to disambiguate articles by using parentheses after the article name, and discussion on WikiProject Astronomical objects has come to the view that the format should be Messier #. Many of the destination pages are redirects with more than one item in the history. Chaos syndrome 20:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]Please discuss this move at Talk:Globular Cluster M2.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Messier 103. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011200151/http://www.zimbio.com/Andromeda+Galaxy/articles/7acHFHcKLjm/The+Constellation+Cassiopeia to http://www.zimbio.com/Andromeda+Galaxy/articles/7acHFHcKLjm/The+Constellation+Cassiopeia
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Confusing lead section
[edit]The lead section is confusing, because it gives two different estimates for the number of stars. It says "There are about 40 member stars within M103...", but two sentences further, it calls Messier 103 a "172-star cluster". While estimates for the correct number do vary, as mentioned in the article further down, the lead should give exactly one figure. Renerpho (talk) 00:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Age
[edit]Looking through the peer reviewed literature the age of the cluster seems to be somewhere between 16-22 million years. Using info from one of the more recent papers I'll change the age from 25 million years to 22 million years. Jjnishiyama (talk) 21:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Plagiarised Text
[edit]Much of the text in this document has been plagiarised from the website by Thompson [1] some of this is paraphrased, but there is also a lot that is taken word for word. This was done by TitanOne on 13 April 2011. This article needs to be revised with new references, and also re-written to have viewpoints that much broader in scope. Itchycoocoo (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)