Talk:Belomorkanal

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Just a note: this thing (calling it a cigarette is a step too far) is the worst tobacco I've ever tried. Don't try them at home unless you are assisted by a group of medics and a chemical treatment squad. However, they have one big advantage over all other cigarettes: they are very useful in killing all moths and other insects in 20 metres radius. The problem is that you can't simply light one up and leave it in the ashtray while leaving the room: they don't burn that easily... Halibu tt 16:20, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)

A certain type of "Basic" (which name eludes me) is worse. My only complaint at the time was, like you said - they go out too fast for me. 68.81.29.74 06:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

when was the brand initiated and by whom, and who owns it now? Are there any tar/nicotine values available? dab (ᛏ) 21:05, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are available: Nicotine: 1,5 - 1,8 mg, Tar: 30 - 35 mg. Also, they're not made from normal paper - they're made from rice-paper (that was cheaper). - Sessy22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sessy22 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The last paragraph seems unnecessary. I removed the statistic at the end after reading the article about the canal itself. ThoughtPollution (talk) 11:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article talks about 200,000,000 Gulag prisoners dying, and, just off-hand, that sounds a bit high to me. Two hundred million prisoner deaths? Can someone cite a source for that figure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.23.86 (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly completely wrong! and now fixed. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC).

Design

To normal people the history and design of the cigarettes is of interest (not it's gain for pot smokers...). Anyway - here is the list of designs of BELOMORKANAL over the decades. http://www.rucig.ru/pap_belomorkanal.htm How about adding it to the article? The newest designs are as disgusting as hereover - with neurotic non-smokers-stickers on it. Brave new world.

-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.112.177.58 (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belomorkanal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402122212/http://www.kelus.art.pl/piosenka/papierosy-bielomor-kanal to http://www.kelus.art.pl/piosenka/papierosy-bielomor-kanal

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belomorkanal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110819161502/http://kuznetsov-ru.livejournal.com/49211.html to http://kuznetsov-ru.livejournal.com/49211.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]