Talk:Survivor (British TV series)

Television: British / Reality Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled (1)

I've submitted Survivor (UK version) and Survivor (UK) to Wikipedia:Duplicate articles. MK 04:58, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Untitled (2)

Nobody else stepped forward, so I went ahead and combined them. MK 06:07, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

"The series was perceived as being not very popular with UK viewers, despite gaining more viewers for the main one hour show than Big Brother, a reality tv 'hit'."

-yes but ITV expects big audiences so it can get the advertising revenue. 7 million viewers is a big deal for Channel 4, but it isn't for ITV. Survivor is most likely expensive to make, so the cost to value ratio isn't good enough for 7 million viewers. Magic Pickle 11:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"It should be noted that contestant John Dalzell made one of the more considerable gaffes in Survivor or indeed any reality show's history when he lost an endurance immunity challenge that involved hanging from a bar with two hands."

Really? This is one of the more considerable gaffes in all reality television history? Maybe a link to back this statement up is in order? Yes, no?

Fair use rationale for Image:JonnyGibbSurvivor.jpg

Image:JonnyGibbSurvivor.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SurvivorUKlogo.jpg

Image:SurvivorUKlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original

The article's first sentence previously claimed that the UK version was the original version of the Survivor (TV series) franchise. Clearly that's incorrect, as the Swedish version debuted four years earlier, and other countries such as the USA had also preceded the British version. The franchise was created in the UK but not produced for UK television until after other countries had produced their own versions. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split Page

I believe this page is ready to be separated into two pages. Can somebody please do it? I don't no how. Thank you all helping to build this page! DarkFireYoshi 00:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Eorror in voting history in survivor uk #2

I've watched the survivor UK series and I know 100% Tyfuen got 5/6 votes not 4/6. I was able to fix all the errors except for the voting history so could somone do it for me as I can't figure out how to fix the error in that area for the life of me.71.134.235.204 (talk) 00:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]