Jump to content

Talk:Middle-earth canon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive notice

[edit]

Old talk archived to Talk:Middle-earth canon/archive3Tttom1 (talk) 03:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original research?

[edit]

The OR tag is still present on the article, but there's no discussion here. If the material has been moved to the archives, I presume the issue is now moot; I propose removing the tag. Discussion? -- Elphion (talk) 18:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can support that proposal. In the present form there is, I believe, no original research in the article. Troelsfo (talk) 09:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Concur. There are still some unsupported statements - especially with regards CRT editorialising the Silmarillion, but they can be dealt with and tagged individually. Davémon (talk) 17:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency in mythological history

[edit]

I hope that I will remember to come back here to check up on this, as it seems that Tolkien Scholarship is taking up more and more of my time, despite the fact that I am trying to become a Cognitive Scientist and Cyberneticist (although, I already am an Art Historian, and managed to study with Joseph Campbell for three months in 1985).

I just wanted to point out regarding Campbell and Tolkien's work.

Joseph Campbell makes a point of saying that Mytho-History does not need to be consistent, that there are many truths, and that they often contradict the factual history upon which the myths have been founded (And I have seen experimental demonstrations of this where myths arise concerning events that have a deep impact upon our psyche). Take 9-11, for instance. There are many stories that contradict each other. Yet there is surely an actual history, which may not be known by any one person, or by any persons at all.

So, research on the History of Tolkien's Canon should include everything that he has written on Middle-earth, contradictory or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew R Bailey (talkcontribs) 03:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Middle-earth canon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]