Talk:Black Elk Peak

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Black Elk Peak article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mountains High‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Dakota Mid‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highest east of Rockies...

I made more accurate and precise the statement about "highest east of the Rockies." It takes so much explanation to make this true, I wonder if it isn't best just to drop it. Also, some people wonder about Guadalupe Peak in this context. Well, it isn't due east of any point in the Rockies (it's way south of the southern tip of the Rockies near Santa Fe, New Mexico) and its longitude is not any more east than the extreme eastern bits of the Rockies in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico. So it isn't east of the Rockies in any reasonable sense. -- Spireguy 03:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are several peaks in the Big Bend region of Texas that are higher than Harney Peak, as well as being farther east. They are all on "mainland North America". I'm a big fan of the Black Hills, and have often repeated this false statement, even altering it to "highest peak east of the Rockies in the United States" but this is also unfortunately false given the aforementioned mountains in Texas. I would be an advocate of dropping the statement altogether. Harney Peak is the highest peak in South Dakota, period. (Unless you wanted to say "highest peak east of the Rockies and outside of Texas in mainland North America" - but you have to add three caveats to make this true!) Blake of the Bluffs 05:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to note that the Big Bend region is south east of the Rocky Mountains. The Rocky Mountain range ends in northern New Mexico. -- Feral Duck 16:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are also numerous peaks in northern New Mexico and southern Colorado that are higher than Harney as well as directly east of the Rockies. The highest peak directly east of the Rockies and in the U.S. should be Fishers Peak in Colorado, which is part of the volcanic region known as the Raton Mesa. Fishers Peak is nearly 10,000 feet high. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myers333 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emory Peak in the Chisos Mountains (which are not reasonably part of the Rockies) is actually farther east! OK, it's southeast of the Rockies but that still counts. I think this statement should either be simply removed or qualified. Vultur~enwiki (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

retitling name section

I think it would be better to retitle the section into “name” rather than leaving in its original name as it’s more logical to do so.

Requested move 11 August 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move already happened. If disputed, no qualms for a separate RM (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 18:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Harney Peak → Black Elk Peak – The name of this mountain was changed by decision of the U.S. Board on Geographic Names on August 11, 2016. Acciavatti (talk) 00:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd go with Hinhan Kaga, the original Lakota name. But Black Elk-Harney Peak would be my second choice, in honor of the spiritual events which occur there (in Black Elks vision he saw a unity of all living things and all people, so a duo name on Wikipedia would do his vision justice). Randy Kryn 1:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Or why not mix all three, something like Hinhan Kaga: Black Elk-Harney Peak. Seems a fair way to go, with all the hubbub about naming rights. Randy Kryn 19:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just noticed the interesting spin to the title, if you put an 's' in front of, as well as in back of, 'Peak', you get the name of the book Black Elk SPeaks. 19:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Procedural comment: The move as suggested has already been carried out. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the name has been officially changed by the US Board on Geographic Names, let's respect that in this article. Someone changed the name back in the Lede to Harney Peak, and I'm going to revert it to the new name, with explanation of change. Let's be adult here.Parkwells (talk) 12:28, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Lead of the article should reflect the official name first. The US Board on Geographic Names has jurisdiction over federal lands. It's not up to editors here to decide they want to do something different.Parkwells (talk) 18:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Elk Peak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151018031008/http://hillcityprevailernews.blogspot.com/2015/05/board-recommends-renaming-harney-peak.html to http://hillcityprevailernews.blogspot.com/2015/05/board-recommends-renaming-harney-peak.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]