Talk:Law & Order: Special Victims Unit

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Law & Order: Special Victims Unit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Law & Order: Special Victims Unit was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 26, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Television: Law & Order Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Law & Order task force (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

NBC News

Ann Curry appearance on Season Finale of Law & Order: SVU

Weird coding

It’s nearly impossible to edit this article on the mobile app because, in many paragraphs, any time I try to edit a particular sentence, the cursor is automatically diverted to the end of the paragraph.

What’s up with this? - Julietdeltalima (talk) 13:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inexplicable past-prospective tense

Compare these two sentences (neither of which are in the article; they’re just condensed examples):

(1) Hargitay would become an executive producer.

(2) Hargitay became an executive producer.

Or:

(1a) Meloni would reprise his character in a 2021 spinoff.

(2a) Meloni reprised his character in a 2021 spinoff.

What am I missing? Why are these cumbersome, confusing, unnecessarily verbose, melodramatic past-prospective-tense constructions as depicted in (1) and (1a) superior in ANY manner to the (2) and (2a) examples?

Thanks for either explaining this to me or just not doing this inefficient and ambiguous clichéd thing any more. Julietdeltalima (talk) 13:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia editors doing an impression of how dumb people think smart people write isn't that big of a mystery. Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 18:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (season 18" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (season 18 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 5 § Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (season 18 until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Law & Order: New York" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Law & Order: New York has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 5 § Law & Order: New York until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Scanavino Screwover

For a while, Peter Scanavino's character of Dominic Carisi had his own page on this site, but you scumbags deleted it, and fans would like to know why. Even after Carisi became a prosecutor, he was still left to languish. That has continued as he married Kelli Giddish's Amanda Rollins and started a family with her. You people need to get to work restoring his page and doing the same for the characters on this show you have long ignored for years. 2600:4809:7270:F800:35CE:B341:10AB:1F5 (talk) 15:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]