Talk:Mister Peepers

Television Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
	A character or cast section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs expansion or clean up. Ideally, this section will be written in prose following the Television Manual of Style and remembering to adhere to the fiction guidelines.
	An episode list needs to be added to this article to improve its quality, using the {{Episode list}} template. Short lists can go in the main article, while longer lists should go in a separate List of `showname` episodes article, using other featured episode lists as an example.

Krusty?

Why does Mr. Peepers redirect to Krusty the Klown? Mr. Peepers was a 50's sitcom and as far as I know has nothing to do with the Simpsons character. MK 03:57, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

It now more pertinently redirects to Wally Cox. - Nunh-huh 07:41, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

(from Martin) Hey, I noticed a question on the Village Pump asking why Mr. Peepers redirs to Krusty the Klown. You made the redir, so I figured I'd ask you directly. I'd be inclined to make it a disamb page, featuring the 1950's show by that name, with mentions of the Chris Kattan character, and any other use, but, I've searched the WP Google cache, and many other Internet Search Hits, and I can find no connection with The Simpsons. Can you help me understand the connection? Niteowlneils 06:36, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Though I created the redirect, I have no idea why... Martin

As of February 2010, this article now refers to someone's cat, rather than the 1950s television sitcom starring Wally Cox. Can this be fixed, please? If someone is interested in this particular cat, wonderful. But the TV show needs a page as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.143.202.206 (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title Wrong?

Why does the title for this entry abbreviate "Mister"? I've been watching the kinescopes of the series, and in the titles it's "Mister Peepers" not "Mr. Peepers". Can we change this to being spelled out? Signinstranger 17:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Peepers → Mister Peepers – Per the title of the show on the DVD covers and title screen itself, and to avoid ambiguation with the SNL character. See also post in section immediately above this one. œ ^™ 06:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there's no way to avoid having a hatnote. Though, I suggest that Mr Peepers (the British spelling - no fullstop) should be used as a disambiguation page 65.92.181.184 (talk) 03:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support rename and move per original request. IMDb lists the show was being titled Mister Peepers as does DVD release. The title here should reflect what is, evidently, correct. Pinkadelica ^♣ 03:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Theme music of the show

It was played by a recorder (block flute) consort, perhaps a quartet. Was a quite-likable composition, not technically difficult. Nikevich 05:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)