Talk:Hooked on Phonics
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Bit on consumer privacy
[edit]Um, are we planning to include a lengthy paragraph on the page of every company that has sold customer lists to third parties? Sheesh. You could spend a week on an article named List of companies that sell customer information to third parties. --KeithTyler
- Hey, I'll take any excuse to flesh out a stub. Rhymeless 07:56, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- So shouldn't you include a criticism section? If I recall correctly, HoP was horribly ineffective. --Muna 19:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Hangon
[edit]I'm a deltionist, but this article does not qualify as a speedy. Give me a moment to drum up some sources and neutralize it. It reads like 80% of the existing co. articles on WP: a history section, ownership, etc. UnitedStatesian 05:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: LING A201 How English Works
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2022 and 15 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Green Hierophant (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Green Hierophant (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Green Hierophant (talk) 10:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)as someone mention before there should be section on the past effectiveness of Hooked on Phonics and I was wondering about the effectiveness of hooked on phonics was in the past and how it holds up today as a tool to teach young kids.