Talk:More Songs About Buildings and Food

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen ^Talk 21:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence

"The album's title refers to the theory of sophomore slump as applied to second albums—that they consist of unfinished or sub-par material from the first album's recording sessions or of failed attempts to recreate the hits from the first album. The title of the album refers to a critic's review of their first album, Talking Heads '77, which said all of their songs were about buildings and food."

This paragraph is pretty weird to read. A conclusion needs to be found as to which was the origin of the title. The first one seems a bit confusing to me, and the second one I don't really believe, because none of their songs are really about food on the first album. I don't have a user account, so I can't really help that much on this, but it's really bugging me now. 207.7.187.135 14:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The AMG review says:

"slyly addressed the sophomore record syndrome, in which songs not used on a first LP are mixed with hastily written new material"

so that part is copyvio.

"The album's title refers to ~~the theory of sophomore slump as applied to second albums—that they consist of unfinished or sub-par material from the first album's recording sessions or~~ of failed attempts to recreate the hits from the first album. The title of the album refers to a critic's review of their first album, Talking Heads '77, which said all of their songs were about buildings and food."

or failed attempts to recreate the hits from the first album

no source.

"~~The album's title refers to the theory of sophomore slump as applied to second albums—that they consist of unfinished or sub-par material from the first album's recording sessions or~~ of failed attempts to recreate the hits from the first album. The title of the album refers to a critic's review of their first album, Talking Heads '77, which said all of their songs were about buildings and food."

The original version on wikipedia is, 'Also the title of the album refers to a critics review of their first album, Talking Heads '77. He said that all of their songs were about buildings and food' with no reference to the name of the critic.

talking-heads.net has a better quote, which is actually sourced.

"When we were making this album I remembered this stupid discussion we had about titles for the last album," Tina smirked. "At that time I said, ‘What are we gonna call an album that's just about buildings and food?' And Chris said, ‘You call it more songs about buildings and food.' "

Let's go with that.Fantailfan 17:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Ao3rz28vc054a

--CactusBot (talk) 10:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"significantly more" popular

I had thought that the relative chart positions spoke for themselves - so this sentence in the lede was just summarizing the chart tables. Talking Heads: 77 made No. 60 on the UK charts, but failed to make the US charts at all, while this album made US No. 29 and UK No. 21. But I agree they do not relate to exact numbers of units. I'll try and look for a source which says this explicitly. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC) Here's a collection of reviews that migfht be useful in any case: [1][reply]