Talk:Toys in the Attic (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aerosmith, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.AerosmithWikipedia:WikiProject AerosmithTemplate:WikiProject AerosmithAerosmith articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

September 25 to October 1, 2016 (9th)

Reverting teeny-tiny song credits

Not a standard (see WikiProject albums)
Also impossible to read

--Fantailfan 16:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vinyl side splitting & number continuation

Separating vinyl sides one and two is very common; check all Beatles, Rolling Stones, etc., where vinyl release preceded by years or decades the CD release. Continuing track numbering is my innovation, for those who have little or no vinyl. Fantailfan (talk) 20:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for splitting the track listing where the original (or prominent) format was vinyl. What I meant was that I have never seen an article where the first song on side two isn't #1, and that on every vinyl label I've seen, the numbering is not continued from previous sides. —Zeagler (talk) 23:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was just putting out there. The <li value (which is non-standard) tag can be removed. Fantailfan (talk) 02:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Song merger proposals

I suggest that the articles Adam's Apple (song), No More No More, and Round and Round (Aerosmith song) be either merged or redirected to Toys in the Attic (album). All of these articles are unreferenced and may not assert notability for a stand-alone article.--Disturbed Nerd999 (Delete!) 20:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After a full week of no objections, I went ahead and boldly redirected these pages.--Disturbed Nerd999 (Delete!) 20:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsed. Thank you much. / edg ☺ ☭ 14:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done All articles redirected.--Disturbed Nerd999 (Delete!) 07:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete short citations

@Besmircher: you added some incomplete short citations to this article in October 2015 (Davis 1997, and Tyler & Dalton 2011). Would you mind expanding those? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My recent work on JJ Cale and Townes Van Zandt was spurned! I wash my hands of all editing. I cited all my sources. If it wasn't good enough, well, I shall walk away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Besmircher (talk • contribs) 02:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Besmircher: You do realize what the problem is, do you? There are millions of people called "Davis" and while in this case it's probably Stephen Davis, he has written probably hundreds of pieces in 1997, so telling us that the source is "Davis 1997" is inadequate. Using short citations is fine, but you also need to provide full details. If you copied this from some other article, which is also fine, you forgot to copy the accompanying full bibliographical details. Please fix this. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, albeit page numbers are still missing. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]