Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony V. DePano
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 14:31, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
Not notable, probable vanity. --fvw* 03:46, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
Keep. A CEO of a significant company aged under 30 is probably notable. Capitalistroadster 04:25, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)Comment: On second thought, this company does not seem to be that notable. Capitalistroadster 04:28, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)- Delete. on Tony Sidaway's basis that it is a likely hoax and certainly not verifiable. Capitalistroadster 09:28, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless proved not a hoax. Google has nothing on "Anthony V. DePano", "Anthony DePano" "Anthony De Pano", "Alatron International"... this would tell a story of a guy that has achieved nothing except a short lived job at daddy's company, except I also can't find a mention of an AOL CFO with this surname - currently it's Steve Swad, previously it was Joseph (Joe) Ripp (2001-2004), Philip Gross was at one point, Mike Kelly (98-01), Lennert Leader (1989-98) - I can't find any DePano. So I call foul.Average Earthman 08:44, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Tεxτurε 18:14, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Evident hoax. Supposedly CEO of a company whose actual CEO is a chap called Warren Stokes. [1] --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:28, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete.--Prem 14:58, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. void of encyclopedic value. --Mecanismo 20:44, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.