Talk:Grant County, Oregon

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

United States: U.S. counties Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

Untitled

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

Start class

If there was some references then this would be a B class article. Aboutmovies 02:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

largest stand of ponderosa

I looked for, but couldn't find a reference for the fact in the article. However, I found this which says the Colorado Plateau has the largest. —EncMstr (talk) 18:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find anything either. I thought possibly it could have changed since the Rodeo-Chediski Fire. Everything I found points to it still being in Arizona.DBerend (talk) 18:58, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking. I'm OK with it getting taken out again, but without an edit summary the first time, I had no idea what was going on. Unfortunately a great deal of this article is unreferenced like that. I'm tempted to blot out all that info and start over. This kind of thing drives me mad! Reference early and often people! Katr67 (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I typed a summary, but upon review it appears I didn't. Sorry about that. Not sure how I came across that. Spent most of the morning verifying sources in the Arizona article, so I know what you mean about "unreferenced".DBerend (talk) 20:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UN vote?

Shouldn't the Grant County "anti UN" referendum be included in the politics section? It gained some attention at the time, even eliciting a response from America's UN representative:

http://blog.oregonlive.com/mapesonpolitics/2011/02/united_nations_ambassador_says.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.33.74.33 (talk) 21:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Grant County, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Grant County, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/604xwpeQL?url=http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/41/41023.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/41/41023.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/common/printfriendly.pl?%2Fscience%2Fnews%2Fenviro%2FEnviroRepublish_828525.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gcoregonlive2.com/votes2008.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]