User talk:BAxelrod

Micromouse and A*

hi

I am curious. In the revision to the micromouse entry that you made on Oct 8th 2004, you state that the A* is one of the more popular search strategies.

It is my understanding that most mice have much simpler algorithms based on a straightforward flooding of the maze in the style of Lee-Moore.

I would be very interested in finding out about any mice that use A*

Pete Harrison

Topknot 19:23, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Unverified images

Thanks for uploading these images:

I notice they currently don't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know their copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release them under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks, Kbh3rd 03:10, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. By default when you upload an image to which you own the rights, you agree to license it under the terms of the Gnu Free Documention License. I think that that should meet your criteria, so I'll tag it that way.

In the future, just add {{GFDL}} to the description page of any of your own images you that you upload. The verbiage on the upload page states that you give your consent to this license by the act of uploading, but without the tag, there's no way for the computer to "know" which images are under which license or which are indeed lacking a compatible license. It is important to be able to use the tags to automatically categorize and sort the images by license.

Also, you should identify yourself as the creator or owner of the image rights, or identify the the original source, so that its provenance is known. You can do all this in the image description field of the upload page if you want – something like this will do:

CadCam drawing of a widget by myself -- {{GFDL}}

More comprehensive description pages are desireable, but that would cover the necessities. Thanks for contributing! And thanks again for replying on this matter. -- Kbh3rd 03:53, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Telerobotics into Telepresence

(It appears that you addended the merge tag.) I do not think this is a good idea as there are substantial differences between the concepts. This may be now a bit more clear with my recent edits to the Telerobotics section concerning Teleoperatation. Message my talk page if you care to comment. - Leonard G. 05:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC)\[reply]

My response is on my User talk - I am interested in working with you on this - will be offline for some time, take your time to respond. Thanks, Leonard G. 23:26, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dendrograms and Computer Vision

Hi, I'm trying to bring some order to the Category:Computer vision page and notice that you (?) have linked the article on dendrogram to this category. I do not see any obvious relation between dendrograms and computer vision from the information presented in the article. Can you please describe this relation? --KYN 20:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I might have done that... I certainly created some of those images. It was a while ago, and I don't remember. But i do remember talking about dendrograms in my computer vision class. They are just a way to visualize data clusters which are used in computer vision for image segmentaion. You can probably delete the reference to dendrogram, but i would include either data clustering or beef up Segmentation (image processing) to include these topics. - BAxelrod 03:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will remove the link to the Computer Vision category for now. Currently, the articles and categories on computer vision and image processing are somewhat out of order and partially overlapping. If you want to link the dendrogram article back into either of these categories, please add some text which explains the relevance of the link. --KYN 09:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Markov decision process

Hello, I've removed the cleanup tag from Markov decision process; I believe you originally tagged it for cleanup in December 2005. Since then it has been expanded quite a bit... --Sabik 16:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Georgia Tech

I see that you're a student at or alum of Georgia Tech! I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Georgia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Georgia Tech. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 17:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania bid

A few dedicated individuals, myself included, are putting together a bid to host Wikimania on Georgia Tech's campus. This is an incredible opportunity, so any assistance that any of you would be able to provide will be greatly appreciated. Please read m:Wikimania 2008/Official requirements for bidding cities and m:Wikimania 2008/Judging criteria and contribute to the ongoing bid, located at m:Wikimania 2008/Bids/Atlanta. The deadline for bids is August 30, 2007, so we need to work and plan quickly. For those interested, there will be an IRC meeting to coordinate the bid tonight (Aug 23) at 7:00PM EST in #wikimania-atlanta on irc.freenode.com. If you can, it would be great if you could log on. Thanks for your help! :) —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 17:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania Atlanta

Hello, Thank you for volunteering to be a part of the Atlanta Wikimaina bid southeast team. We are holding meetings weekdays at 7:30pm EDT in #wikimania-atlanta on irc.freenode.org. For more information about IRC see m:Wikimania_2008/Bids/Atlanta/IRC. If you are able to make it, that would be great.

We now also have Google group for coordinating this bid. To get updates on the bid and our progress, please join the Google Groups mailing list at Google Groups wikimania-atlanta.

There is also a group on the social networking site Facebook in which interested parties can express their support for the bid.

If you do not wish to continue to receive these notifications about the bid or would rather they go to a talk page on a different project please change m: Wikimania_2008/Bids/Atlanta/Notify_list--Cspurrier 21:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimaina Atlanta meeting

We will be holding a meeting tonight at 9:30pm EDT in #wikimania-atlanta on irc.freenode.org. For more information about IRC see m:Wikimania_2008/Bids/Atlanta/IRC. Please try to be at this meeting as it is one of the last ones before bidding ends and we still have lots that need to be discussed. --Cspurrier 19:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2008/Conference of the Americas

Hello, As you may or may not know, Alexandria, Egypt was selected to host Wikimania 2008 [1]. So as to prevent the hard work of the many Wikimedians involved in the Atlanta bid from going to waste, we have decided to host a conference for the Americas. This is in no way an attempt to compete with Wikimania or make a statement against Wikimania.

As one of the people signed up to help with the Wikimania Atlanta bid, we hope you will join us at the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas. We will be having a meeting tonight in IRC tonight (Oct 15) at 9:30PM in #cota-atlanta on irc.freenode.org to discuss the conference. For more information about IRC see [2].

For more information about the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas see http://www.cota-atlanta.org and our wiki http://www.cota-atlanta.org/wiki.

If you do not wish to receive further notices about the COTA please remove your name from our notify list. --Cspurrier 18:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:VC3.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:VC3.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robot software

Just a little notification, when you reverted the vandalism on Robot Software, the vandal blanked the top of the article as well. I've fixed that problem, and you probably know this, but in the future, the (undo) button is generally the best way to revert rather than just removing the vandalism. Have a nice day, --Utopianfiat (talk) 20:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with detailed content about Atlanta

We desperately need opinions and input as to how to organize the detailed content on Atlanta topics, see Talk:Culture_of_Atlanta#Where_should_topic_detail_go.3F Keizers (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BAxelrod. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prod

Proposed deletion of Culture speculation

The article Culture speculation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can’t find any sources for this phrase as it’s defined on this page. I think it’s original research. It was created by an Ip user in 2004 - and has never been sourced from day one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 03:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]