Talk:Aztalan State Park

Aztalan State Park is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 25, 2003	Featured article candidate	Promoted
February 2, 2006	Featured article review	Demoted

Current status: Former featured article

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"Lapham" appears without additional identification in the Stockade section and is quoted there. His full name is not given until the succeeding section.

The "(v.i.)" after his name stands for the Latin "vide infra", and is a standard abbreviation for "see below". Q.E.D., and all that. -- John Owens 18:05, 2003 Sep 13 (UTC)

Request for references

Hi, I am working to encourage implementation of the goals of the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy. Part of that is to make sure articles cite their sources. This is particularly important for featured articles, since they are a prominent part of Wikipedia. Further reading is not the same thing as proper references. Further reading could list works about the topic that were not ever consulted by the page authors. If some of the works listed in the further reading section were used to add or check material in the article, please list them in a references section instead. The Fact and Reference Check Project has more information. Thank you, and please leave me a message when you have added a few references to the article. - Taxman 19:33, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

I'm stating the obvious here, but this is the best Wis. State Park article. I hope to see some of the others along the same lines. Good work.--Hraefen 20:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm making a request for removing it from FA status right now, needs some help this article. Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 18:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wattle and daub

Why does the article state that the method is similar to w&d rather than that it is w&d? Kdammers (talk) 03:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

first settlement

here I read, it was settled first around 900, and this should be the Middle Mississippian Tradition. According to this Information from Wikipedias Page about the Mississippian Culture, this can't be true.The EARLY Mississippian Period alone is dated from 1000-1200 in most places there, the Middle M is dated to 1200-1400. Please forgive me my lousy english but I hope, I could help anyway a little bit -- Hartmann Schedel ^cheers 09:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand the associated articles correctly, the "Middle" refers to area, not time period. But then the map on Mississippian culture seems to show Aztalan well within the "Oneota" area. I think this bears more investigation. Thank you for pointing that out.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gimme danger (talk • contribs) _{who should really know better}

thank you for the quick response gimme shelter. When I read your comment, I read again this infos and I didn't found any hint, it could be meant an "aerea". For me and my lousy english the meaning is very directly in the "time". Sure, this means nothing because my english is really not good and I "bite" myself through the articles - often with the help of online-translators -- Hartmann Schedel ^cheers 11:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it means, this article deserves to be looked at again, since it has very few references. Please don't worry about your English; you are much better at English than I am at your language. :-) --Danger (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Sire :-) -- Hartmann Schedel ^cheers 17:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aztalan State Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090403222432/http://tps.cr.nps.gov:80/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=24&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=24&ResourceType=Site

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

human sacrifice.

Looks like you forgot something.

https://www.si.edu/es/object/posts_396df00e8c74535c3a41e1469c67f066

You might want to include it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.92.180 (talk) 02:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no particular "you" on Wikipedia. Everyone can add content to articles, and that includes you. Eissink (talk) 22:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

You're an editor. I am not, nor do I want to be an editor on Wikipedia. If I can add it and not be an editor then I need to know how to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.248.13.32 (talk) 16:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]