Elephant Gambit
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moves | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO | C40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | King's Knight Opening | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synonym(s) | Queen's Pawn Countergambit Englund Counterattack |
The Elephant Gambit (also called the Queen's Pawn Countergambit, Englund Counterattack or Turkish Gambit) is a rarely played chess opening beginning with the moves:
The Elephant Gambit is generally considered unsound, with black typically unable to gain compensation for the sacrificed pawn.
Lines
[edit]White is able to capture either of Black's center pawns with the advantage, either by 3.exd5 or 3.Nxe5. With a center pawn removed, Black is in a passive position with White clearly having the initiative as White controls more space.
3.exd5
[edit]Black's responses to 3.exd5 include 3...e4 and 3...Bd6 (the Elephant Gambit proper). 3...Qxd5 saves the pawn, but leaves White with a big lead in development after 4.Nc3.
3...e4
[edit]After 3...e4 4.Qe2 Nf6 lines might continue:
- 5.d3 Qxd5 6.Nbd2 Be7 7.dxe4 Qe6 and White remains a pawn ahead, although Black's development is somewhat smoother.
- 5.d3 Be7 6.dxe4 0-0 7.Nc3 Re8 8.Bd2 Bb4 9.0-0-0, with advantage for White (Nick de Firmian).
- 5.Nc3 Be7 6.Nxe4:
- 6...Nxd5 7.d3 0-0 8.Qd1 Bg4 9.Be2 f5 10.Ng3 Nc6 11.c3 with slight advantage for White, as in Salomonsson–H. Sorenson, Malmo 1982 (de Firmian).
- 6...0-0 7.Nxf6+ Bxf6 8.d4 Re8 9.Be3 with distinct superiority for White (de Firmian).
After 3...e4 4.Qe2, Tal–Lutikov, Tallinn 1964[1] continued 4...f5 5.d3 Nf6 6.dxe4 fxe4 7.Nc3 Bb4 8.Qb5+ c6 9.Qxb4 exf3 10.Bg5 cxd5 11.0-0-0 Nc6 with advantage for White.
Elephant Gambit proper: 3...Bd6
[edit]a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
After 3...Bd6 4.d4 e4 5.Ne5 Nf6 6.Nc3 0-0 7.Bc4, according to de Firmian, White enjoys a distinct superiority but no immediate attack.
3.Nxe5
[edit]After 3.Nxe5:
- Black plays 3...Bd6 4.d4 dxe4 5.Bc4 Bxe5 6.Qh5 Qf6 7.dxe5, which is thought to be slightly better for White.
- In Lob–Eliskases, German CC 1929, Black played 3...dxe4. The game continued 4.Bc4 Qg5 5.Bxf7+ Ke7 6.d4 Qxg2 7.Rf1 Bh3 8.Bc4 Nf6 9.Bf4 and White went on to win.
- 3...Qe7? leads to an advantage for White after 4.d4 f6 5.Nd3 dxe4 6.Nf4 Qf7 7.Nd2 (Bondarevsky–Lilienthal, USSR 1941).
See also
[edit]References
[edit]Bibliography
- Burgess, Graham. The Mammoth Book of Chess. London: Constable and Robinson, 2000.
- de Firmian, Nick (1999). Modern Chess Openings (14th ed.). New York: David McKay Company Inc. pp. 150–51.
- Hooper, David; Whyld, Kenneth (1996) [First pub. 1992]. "Queen's Pawn Counter-gambit". The Oxford Companion to Chess (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 329. ISBN 0-19-280049-3.
External links
[edit]- The Kibitzer: "We're Going On An Elephant Hunt" by Tim Harding (August 1997) at ChessCafe.com