User talk:Gsgeorge

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Gsgeorge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

I also edit a lot of Michigan-related pages, and noticed some of you edits. I'm glad to have another contributor. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Cheers, older≠wiser 23:14, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Gravity Hill/Arcadia

I've been vacationing in Arcadia, MI (Manistee County) for most of my life. What's your connection with it? Fishal 05:34, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

Image:Detroitmetroarea1.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 05:53, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Lower Peninsula image

Nice work there on Lower Peninsula of Michigan! Mackensen (talk) 20:23, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Michigan wealthy cities

You added data to the Michigan article on the wealthiest cities. Could you add a date and source for this data? Rmhermen 16:45, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

WikiPedia Chapter In Michigan

I'm trying to corral people that may be from Michigan to see if anyone is interested in hosting a US Wikipedia in Ann Arbor, MI. If there is intrest with enough Michigan/Ohio members, I will try to pull together a location, like the conference space at Internet II or the University of Michigan School of Information. Please let me know what you think and spread the word. We can use my page as a discussion area. --Ronreed 23:51, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Arbor, Michigan - Image question

I saw you have uploaded the following images: Image:Ann-Arbor-City-Flag.gif and Image:Ann-Arbor-City-Flag.gif. Can you tell me of the images' source and why they are in the public domain? I have placed the article through peer review and a question was brought up concerning the images. Thanks. Pentawing 01:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying the images. Hopefully that will be resolved. In the meantime, can you look over the article? I have added a lot since and need a second opinion on it. Pentawing 04:23, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request for map

No problem on the Ann Arbor map. I'll have it posted tomorrow afternoon. Let me know if you have any more city articles you want to feature. SoundGod3 03:43, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Arbor, Michigan - Expansion help

I can see that you are enthusiastic over the possibility of this article's becoming featured. At the moment, there are some shortcomings, the most glaring is "sports and recreation." I am in the process of looking for verifiable information that I add that to the article. If you have any other ideas, can you please tell me so that we could coordinate changes? Thanks. Pentawing 16:13, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I closed the peer review and placed the article for FAC. Pentawing 23:15, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
- I think this is your chance to make up for your "lack of participation" (though you did contribute in some way, especially with the map image, which is good). You could take a picture of S. University or State Street if you wish (I've taken some images and will place them up soon). How you take that picture is up to you. Pentawing 20:59, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

Image:M185mackinac.jpg

You own the copyright to the photo Image:M185mackinac.jpg, yet it is marked fair use. Are you sure that you did not mean to license it under the GFDL or CC or release it into the public domain? It really makes no sense because fair use images are depreciated and one should assume they will be deleted if not indispensible (e.g., logos). 119 11:18, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Montreal-Mirabel International Airport

I recently saw that you had concerns about POV issues with the article. Since I had voted to support the article's promotion to FA (a mistake in hindsight), I decided to try to repair as many of the problems as possible. If you have the chance, can you look at the article and suggest necessary repairs? The last thing I want to see is the article's being nominated for FA removal. Thanks. Pentawing 00:21, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Michigan

I know you sometimes edit articles on Michigan-related items. You might be interested in the new wikiproject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan. Cheers. older≠wiser 20:49, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

University of Michigan

Though you might be busy at the moment, I am wondering if you would be interested in looking over the article and comment on what else is needed. Thanks. Pentawing 03:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is close to FA. However, if you get the chance can you please look at it and see if there is anything more that is needed? Thanks. Pentawing 21:46, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensing

Hi, I notice Image:Southmanitoulighthouse.jpg is by you, but does not have a free license on it. Could you please add one? Also check your other image uploads please - we're scrubbing out all the unlicensed images. Stan 00:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I know what you mean, I have to have the list up in its own window to keep track. {{PD-self}} is the most "wide open", lots of people use it. Come to think of it, you could put a blanket statement on your user page saying "all my pics are PD", then the image elves don't have to bug you about each one they look at. Stan 03:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Arbor

Hey there!

Doesn't look like you're around much, but if you see this soon... I wanted to ask your permission to use Image:Ann Arbor at Liberty Street.jpg over on Wikitravel, where I'm a frequent contributor and admin. In order to do that you'd need to license it under Creative Commons by SA 1.0.

Ann Arbor is currently nominated for Star status (our equivalent to "featured article"), so I'm trying to get some better images that represent the town. I'd also love if you could look over the Ann Arbor article there and see what you think, since you live(d) there... anything missing? Anyhow, thanks! – cacahuate ^talk 06:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Ann-Arbor-City-Seal.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ann-Arbor-City-Seal.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:StMarysprepbuilding.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:StMarysprepbuilding.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Manitou Island Light

I did quite a bit of work on this article. I just wanted to thank you for the wonderful picture that adds a lot to the article. Very nice shot. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 22:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

FAR for Ann Arbor

I have nominated Ann Arbor, Michigan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

South Manitou Island shipwreck

OK, it's a bit of a long shot as you haven't edited since 2008 and I can't find a link to e-mail you. I'm hoping you've got your settings so that you receive an e-mail when anyone edits your talk page.

I noticed you've done work on the South Manitou Island and added a photo of the lighthouse. Are you able to get a photograph of the wreck of the SS Francisco Morazan for used in the article when it is created? Mjroots (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detroit-Griswold st.jpg needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Detroit-Griswold st.jpg is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.

Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.

If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.

If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{own}} template on the media information page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detroit-Skaters in front of Compuware.jpg needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Detroit-Skaters in front of Compuware.jpg is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.

Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.

If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.

If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{own}} template on the media information page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Detroit-Griswold st.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Detroit-Griswold st.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MichiganRegions.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MichiganRegions.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Microphones glow pt2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Microphones glow pt2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detroitmetroarea.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Detroitmetroarea.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Gsgeorge}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MapSleepingbear.jpg

The file File:MapSleepingbear.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Detroitmetroarea.jpg

Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please update it to {{img-claimed}} if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If the {{Media by uploader}} tag is present, please add |claimed=yes to the tag, if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:MichiganTheaterlobbyDetroit.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MichiganTheaterlobbyDetroit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gsgeorge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]