Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lowbrow
Lowbrow was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.
Dicdef. Thue | talk 19:01, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- No, vanity. As a dicdef, it's not even accurate. Merriam-Webster gives the very appropriate definition "'a person with little taste or intellectual interest" . Indeed. Delete. JRM 19:09, 2004 Nov 10 (UTC)
- Delete: Spam. "Go to this site and enjoy stupid stuff!" No, thanks: we're already looking at stupid stuff. High brow, middle brow, low brow: how much hair you lack: how intelligent and professorial you are, supposedly. (Delete before someone makes it into an article that they drink in "Futurama.") Geogre 20:05, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - dicdef, inaccurate and therefore should not be transiwkied. -- Cyrius|✎ 23:21, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I thought lowbrow.com was shut down due to heavy traffic? Even if it's back, it's not really notable (though it is, or at least was, sometimes funny). Delete. -Sean Curtin 01:31, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.