Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bavarian druglords
Non-notable "musical collective". RickK 06:04, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, any article that starts with Foo is a bar that is mentioned about one hundred times on the Internet should be instantly deleted for non-notability. -- Ferkelparade π 07:16, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. But I note that the quote above plus This suggests they have had no great impact on music or popular culture seem to have been added by an unsympathetic critic rather than the original author. Perhaps we should revisit my idea of probably not famous people? Andrewa 08:43, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- You're right, after checking the edit history, I see that my reason for voting to delete has been wrong :P My vote still stands, unless someone can convince me of notability -- Ferkelparade π 16:52, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. But I note that the quote above plus This suggests they have had no great impact on music or popular culture seem to have been added by an unsympathetic critic rather than the original author. Perhaps we should revisit my idea of probably not famous people? Andrewa 08:43, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: I think the "Almost Famous People" category/holder is ok, but, to some degree, notability sufficient for an encyclopedia really should make it hard for us to be fooled by vanity/enemies. This is not always the case, as with Christopher Knowles, but pop bands get notable as they get talked about. (Not saying this well, sorry.) Geogre 13:47, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, probably vanity. Mainly plugs their supposed movement. — Gwalla | Talk 16:41, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete; borders on patent nonsense. a small gathering of people who are experienced globally. their channels include music, art, culture, travel, theory, philosophy and mental architecture. broad educational backgrounds ranging from doctor to architect to life living creatures. revolution is the target of their work and ridding the world of excessive meaningless art is accomplished by their involvement in "the kill art movement". . . . There are other musicians involved but due to legality issues (record label rules) they are unable to reveal their identity. This would be puffery void of meaning even if it could be verified. Smerdis of Tlön 20:14, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Do Not Delete. Just because you haven't heard of something and/or cannot find more than a hundred results for it on the internet does not mean that it's invalid or "vanity". This movement is alive and well and across many different lands. I suggest you open your minds and not just claim that everything is an invalid "plug". Music and art and artists are abundant on Wikipedia and I believe this is a valid entry. (Vote by User:Everso, the article's author)
VfD discussion was blanked by 24.136.26.92, creator of the page. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:42, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: It's not the first page they have blanked. It's also possible that this article was previously deleted under a slightly different name. Andrewa 07:26, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)