Jump to content

Talk:Compatibility layer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

(2nd external) Link to Application Compatibility Tools in Windows XP is broken at Microsoft as of Jan 25 2005 - bumps back to top level (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/columns/archive.mspx)

So it has! I've kept the old link 'cos it was a reference (and have moved it to "references"), and added a new link for people who want to read about it - David Gerard 15:20, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

compatibility layer or emulator?

[edit]

"Emulator" and related terms are used far too often in this article and are confusing the newbies, particularly where Wine for GNU/Linux is concerned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.167.182.246 (talk) 02:41, August 23, 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't OSX's Classic have to emulate the old hardware? (e.g. 68k) Also wouldn't Old World ROM have to be emulated as well? This sounds like a lot of emulation going on to be called a compatibility layer.--Victoria h 04:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Classic does OS 9 on PowerPC. You're thinking of the 68040 emulator they put in when they moved from 68k to PowerPC, which they've now removed I think - David Gerard 08:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FreeBSD

[edit]

That list item is specifically about the FreeBSD approach, hence the reference. It's not a "me too!" fanboy laundry list opportunity - David Gerard 08:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're an idiot, the implementation used by FreeBSD is the same one used on all four, if you do not know what you are talking about, do not talk. 65.94.97.124 23:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on your knowledge; if you want to keep using it on Wikipedia, reading Wikipedia:Civility is a suggested idea. - David Gerard 12:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cygwin?

[edit]

Is Cygwin a compatibility layer? If so it would be good to include in the examples — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarnobat (talkcontribs) 22:54, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarnobat: I went ahead and added that change as it does have a compatibility layer API. TheStackOverflow (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Compatibility layer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]